- 905 943 4252
- info@dahablaw.com
- Mon - Fri: 9:00 - 5:00
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Lingard v. Milne-McIsaac
The Court of Appeal ruled that the Defendant Wawanesa was obligated to provide the Plaintiff Lingard with uninsured vehicle coverage.
FSCO Decision
Mangaleswary v TD Home and Auto
The FSCO adjudicator determined that out-of-pocket expenses constitute an economic loss, thereby satisfying the definition of incurred under the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.
FSCO Decision
Kolapully and TTC
The Applicant was a pedestrian when hit by a TTC Bus. The Adjudicator determined that the Applicant was entitled to the benefits she had been denied by the insurance company including non-earner benefits, medical benefits, the costs of assessments, reasonable expenses, and interest.
LAT Decision
Applicant v TTC Insurance
Despite the efforts of the Insurer, the Applicant was found to be Catastrophically impaired by the License Appeal Tribunal, thereby raising the limits of her entitlements to benefits.
LAT Decision
S.K. v TTC Insurance (Reconsideration Decision)
The LAT Adjudicator denied the request of an Insurance Company moving for reconsideration of an earlier decision determining that the Applicant was Catastrophically impaired.
LAT Decision
17-001473 v Unica Insurance Inc.
Decision regarding Traumatic Brain Injury
LAT Decision
17-001670/AABS v Travelers Insurance Company of Canada
Reconsideration decision regarding medical reasons and validity in denial of benefits.
LAT Decision
J. G. v Travelers Canada
Decision following removal of the MIG based on invalid denial of benefits addressing costs.
LAT Decision
17-001315 v Royal Sun Alliance Insurance
Decision regarding Insurer delayed response to benefits.
LAT Decision
17-001670 v The Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company
Appealed decision regarding the MIG and denial notices.
LAT Decision
17-01651/AABS v Dominion Insurance
Decision regarding sufficiency of pre-existing conditions and the MIG.
Divisional Court Judicial Review
TTC Insurance Company Limited v. Kolapully
The Applicant, TTC Insurance sought Judicial Review of a decision by the Director’s Delegate of the Financial Services Commission of Ontario. TTC submitted that the Arbitrator failed to apply the “continuously prevents’ aspect of the test for non-earner benefits, the Arbitrator made a palpable and overriding error in assessing Ms. Kolapully’s creditability, and the Arbitrator’s finding that her degree of impairments meeting the test of non-earner benefits was not supported by the record.
The Divisional Court found the Applicant’s submissions to “hold little merit” and that the Director’s Delegate decision was reasonable. The application was dismissed with costs awarded to our client in the amount of $25,000.00
Disclaimer: Information on our website is not and is not intended to be legal opinion. You should consult with a lawyer and seek legal advice. Visiting our website and/or contacting us through this website does not create a solicitor-client relationship. Dahab Law is not responsible for damages arising out of the use of our website. By visiting our website you agree to these terms.
About
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Contact Us
Personal Injury
Motor Vehicle Accident
Slip & Fall
Civil Litigation
Long Term Disability
Wills & Estate
Notary
Corporate Law
Commercial Leases
Contracts
Corporate Books
Commercial Transactions
About
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Contact Us
Personal Injury
Motor Vehicle Accident
Slip & Fall
Civil Litigation
Long Term Disability
Wills & Estate
Notary
Corporate Law
Commercial Leases
Contracts
Corporate Books
Commercial Transactions